Publishing Ethics
(ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS)
It is important for authors to avoid misrepresenting study results because doing so could undermine the credibility of the journal, the professionalism of scientific writing, and eventually the entire field of science. Following the guidelines of good scientific procedure can assist preserve the integrity of the research and its presentation.
It is not advisable to submit the work to many publications for consideration at the same time. Unless the new work is an extension of earlier work, the submitted work must be original and cannot have been published elsewhere in any form or language, either partially or completely. (Please be transparent about material reuse to allay worries about text recycling, or "self-plagiarism"). To boost the number of submissions, a single study shouldn't be divided into multiple portions and submitted to different publications at different times, or to just one Journal. Authors must follow discipline-specific guidelines while gathering, choosing, and analyzing data. Plagiarism is the practice of presenting information, ideas, or texts by others as though they were the author's own. When copying anything exactly as written, you have to properly acknowledge other works (this includes summarizing, paraphrasing, and closely copying literature). You also need to obtain permissions for any copyrighted content and use quotation marks to indicate phrases copied from other sources.
Both research and non-research publications, such as viewpoints, evaluation, and commentary pieces, must cite pertinent and acceptable literature to back up their assertions. It is generally discouraged for contributors to coordinate their efforts to collectively self-cite or engage in excessive and inappropriate self-citation. Writers should refrain from making false claims about an entity (which might be a single person or an organization) or from describing their conduct or acts in a way that could be interpreted as an accusation or personal assault. It is highly recommended that authors verify the author group, corresponding author, and author order are accurate at the time of submission with complete details including designation, department, university, city, and email addresses of all the authors. It is usually not allowed to add or remove authors during the revision stages, though there may be circumstances where it is justified. Changes in authorship should have thorough justification. Please be aware that after a paper is accepted, authorship changes cannot be made after the approval of the Galley Proof.
Authors should be willing to provide pertinent records or information upon request so that the authenticity of the results can be confirmed. This could take the shape of unprocessed data, samples, documents, etc. Confidential or proprietary data that contains sensitive information is not included.
Under the standards set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Journal and/or Publisher will launch an investigation in the event of suspected misconduct or allegations of fraud. If, following a comprehensive examination, verified concerns are found, the identified author(s) will be notified formally via the email addresses they have provided, allowing them to rectify the issue.
When submitting their submissions, authors are free to choose appropriate reviewers and/or ask that particular individuals be excluded from consideration. Writers should ensure that reviewers they recommend are completely unbiased and have no affiliation with the content. It is highly advised to propose a diverse group of reviewers from various institutions and nations. In order to verify the identity of potential reviewers, the Corresponding Author must include an institutional email address. If this is not feasible, they may also include a link to their personal homepage, the publication record, or their researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Though recommendations are welcome and may speed up the peer review process, please understand that the Journal has the authority to adopt them or not.
PUBLISHING ETHICS
The "Journal of Regional Studies Review" (JRSR) is unwavering in its commitment to maintaining the highest standards of publishing ethics. The journal adheres to a set of ethical principles to ensure the integrity, credibility, and fairness of the scholarly publishing process. Authors, reviewers, editors, and all stakeholders involved in the publication process are expected to uphold the following ethical guidelines:
- Authorship and Originality:
- Authors must ensure that their submitted manuscripts represent original work and have not been published elsewhere.
- Proper attribution and acknowledgment of the work of others must be provided, and any form of plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
- Peer Review Process:
- Authors should actively participate in the peer-review process, responding promptly to comments and queries to enhance the quality of their work
- Reviewers are expected to conduct fair, unbiased, and confidential evaluations, contributing to the improvement of the manuscript.
- Conflicts of Interest:
- Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise the objectivity or integrity of the research or publication process.
- Editors and reviewers should recuse themselves from the review process when conflicts of interest are present.
- Data Accuracy and Reproducibility:
- Authors are responsible for presenting accurate and reliable data with transparent reporting of research methodologies.
- Authors should retain research data for a reasonable period after publication to facilitate verification and reproducibility.
- Plagiarism and Citation:
- Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited. Proper citation and acknowledgment of the work of others are essential.
- Editors and reviewers are vigilant in identifying and addressing any instances of plagiarism or unethical citation practices.
- Ethical Treatment of Subjects:
- Authors conducting research involving human subjects or animals must adhere to ethical standards and obtain necessary approvals from relevant ethical review boards.
- Manuscripts reporting on studies involving human subjects should include a statement confirming adherence to ethical standards and obtaining informed consent.
- Corrections and Retractions:
- Authors are obligated to report errors promptly, and the journal reserves the right to issue corrections, retractions, or other appropriate actions in cases of serious ethical concerns or misconduct.
- Editorial Independence:
- Editors and editorial board members must act independently and impartially, avoiding any personal, financial, or professional influences that could compromise the integrity of the editorial process.
Adherence to these ethical principles is essential to the "Journal of Regional Studies Review" in maintaining the trust of our readership and the broader academic community. We are dedicated to fostering a publishing environment characterized by integrity, transparency, and the responsible dissemination of knowledge in the field of regional studies.
