Social Media Influencers and Cosmetics: The Role of Trust and Materialism in Consumer Purchase Decisions

Authors

  • Laiba Iqbal Masters of Business Administration, Marketing, Karachi University Business School (KUBS), Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Sohaib Uz Zaman Assistant Professor, Karachi University Business School (KUBS), Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-3292
  • Syed Hasnain Alam Karachi University Business School (KUBS), Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-7365

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2024.3a065

Keywords:

Social Media, Exchange Theory, Materialism, Trust, Influencer

Abstract

Social media influencers are used on a large scale as a type of marketing strategy, due to the speed with which they can gain the trust of followers. They’re a new twist on opinion leaders; their followers are inspired by them and strongly affect their attitudes and behaviors. Using the social exchange theory and its fundamental principle of reciprocity, the current research examined if the fundamental attributes of an influencer (i.e., expertise, authenticity, physical attractiveness, homophily) can act as interpersonal assets in the process of gaining followers' trust. If the reliance of the follower in an influencer begets loyalty to that digital creator, and whether favorable output (e.g., product attitude, and purchase intention) are due to advertising, were covered as well. Results showed that source credibility and attractiveness were significant in developing relational trust. Moreover, the findings show that materialism mediates the link among exposure to influencers and buying intention. The results highlight important consequences for the strategic implementation of influencer marketing by suggesting an increased understanding of the persuasion processes that shape influencer–follower dynamics. Also, these understandings add to existing works on social media influencers and materialism, whilst giving useful recommendations to influencers and marketers to better their strategies expertly.

Author Biography

  • Laiba Iqbal, Masters of Business Administration, Marketing, Karachi University Business School (KUBS), Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: laaibahiqbal24@gmail.com

References

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921.

Baker, S., & Martinson, D. L. (2002). Out of the red-light district: Five principles for ethically proactive public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(3), 15.

Barbalet, J. (2017). Social Exchange Theory. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493.n287

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203792643/exchange-power-social-life-peter-blau

Bolat, E., & Gilani, P. (2018). Instagram influencers: When a special relationship with fans turns dark. The Conversation, 7th August 2018. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31127/1.pdf

Boman, C. D., Schneider, E. J., & Akin, H. (2023). Examining the mediating effects of sincerity and credibility in crisis communication strategies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(4), 550-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-09-2022-0118

Breves, P. L., Liebers, N., Abt, M., & Kunze, A. (2019). The Perceived Fit between Instagram Influencers and the Endorsed Brand: How Influencer–Brand Fit Affects Source Credibility and Persuasive Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(4), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2019-030

Briñol, P., & Petty, R. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802643640

Brooks, G., & Piskorski, M. (2018). The trusted influencer: How they do it and how brands can benefit. Advances in Consumer Research, 46, 489–490.

Brown, K. W., Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., & Konow, J. (2016). Materialism, Spending, and Affect: An Event-Sampling Study of Marketplace Behavior and Its Affective Costs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2277–2292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9694-9

Bu, Y., Parkinson, J., & Thaichon, P. (2022). Influencer marketing: Homophily, customer value co-creation behaviour and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66(102904), 102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102904

Chaffey, D. (2025, February 14). Global social media statistics research summary 2025 [Feb 2025 update]. Smart Insights. https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/

Chaker, N. N., Walker, D., Nowlin, E. L., & Anaza, N. A. (2019). When and how does sales manager physical attractiveness impact credibility: A test of two competing hypotheses. Journal of Business Research, 105, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.08.004

Chen, J. K. C., & Sriphon, T. (2022). Authentic leadership, trust, and social exchange relationships under the influence of leader behavior. Sustainability, 14(10), 5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105883

Chung, J. (jae), Ding, Y., & Kalra, A. (2023). I really know you: How influencers can increase audience engagement by referencing their close social ties. The Journal of Consumer Research, 50(4), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad019

Clark, J. K., Wegener, D., Habashi, M., & Evans, A. T. (2012). Source Expertise and Persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 100–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211420733

Cook, K. S., & Rice, E. (2006). Social Exchange Theory. In Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 53–76). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-x_3

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2018). ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491

Etzkorn, K. (2021). How Digital Shopping Will Evolve: Three Trends to Watch. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2021/04/09/how-digital-shopping-will-evolve-three-trends-to-watch/

Eyal, G. (2018, July 9). Why Influencers Fail to Disclose Commercial Relationships and the Brands that Enable Them. https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/why-influencers-fail-to-disclose-commercial-relationships-and-the-brands-that-enable-them/

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Foy, J. E., Locasto, P. C., Briner, S. W., & Dyar, S. (2017). Would a madman have been so wise as this?” The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition, 45, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1

Frank, B., & Mitsumoto, S. (2023). An extended source attractiveness model: The advertising effectiveness of distinct athlete endorser attractiveness types and its contextual variation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(4), 1091–1114.

Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001

Friman, M., Rosenbaum, M., & Otterbring, T. (2020). The relationship between exchanged resources and loyalty intentions. The Service Industries Journal, 40, 846–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1561875

Geng, Y., & Maimaituerxun, M. (2022). Research Progress of Green Marketing in Sustainable Consumption based on CiteSpace Analysis. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221119835. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119835

Geyser W. (2022, January 24). Influencer Marketing Benchmark Report 2025. Influencer Marketing Hub. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/

Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833

Global influencer market size 2025. (2025, February 18). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092819/global-influencer-market-size/

Górnik-Durose, M. (2020). Materialism and Well-Being Revisited: The Impact of Personality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10902-019-00089-8

Grönroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing (Vol. 27). Lexington books Lexington, MA.

Gui, C., Luo, A., Zhang, P., & Deng, A. (2020). A meta-analysis of transformational leadership in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32, 2137–2154. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2019-0507

Haenlein, M., Anadol, E., Farnsworth, T., Hugo, H., Hunichen, J., & Welte, D. (2020). Navigating the New Era of Influencer Marketing: How to be Successful on Instagram, TikTok, & Co. California Management Review, 63, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620958166

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. In Multivariate data analysis (pp. 785–785).

Hair, J., Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hill, S. R., & Qesja, B. (2022). Social media influencer popularity and authenticity perception in the travel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 43, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2149740

Hohenberg, B. C. von, & Guess, A. (2022). When Do Sources Persuade? The Effect of Source Credibility on Opinion Change. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10, 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.2

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1974-20800-000

Hoult, D. I. (2011). The principle of reciprocity. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 213(2), 344–346.

Hudders, L., Jans, S. D., & Veirman, M. de. (2020). The commercialization of social media stars: A literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40, 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925

Hughes, B. T., Flournoy, J., & Srivastava, S. (2020). Is perceived similarity more than assumed similarity? An interpersonal path to seeing similarity between self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000369

Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., Hameed, Z., Khan, I. U., & Azam, R. I. (2018). Social comparison, materialism, and compulsive buying based on stimulus-response-model: A comparative study among adolescents and young adults. Young Consumers, 19(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2017-00713

Jackson, L., Hunter, J., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787149

Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375

Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Leary, M. (2019). The Enigma of Being Yourself: A Critical Examination of the Concept of Authenticity. Review of General Psychology, 23, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/GPR0000157

Kennedy, M. S., Ferrell, L. K., & LeClair, D. T. (2001). Consumers’ trust of salesperson and manufacturer: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00039-9

Kenton, S. B. (1989). Speaker Credibility in Persuasive Business Communication: A Model Which Explains Gender Differences 1. Journal of Business Communication, 26(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194368902600204

Khan, M. M., Memon, Z., & Kumar, S. (2019). Celebrity endorsement and purchase intentions: The role of perceived quality and brand loyalty. Market Forces, 14(2).

Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232.

Kim, E., Shoenberger, H., & Sun, Y. (2021). Living in a material world: Sponsored Instagram posts and the role of materialism, hedonic enjoyment, perceived trust, and need to belong. Social Media Society, 7(3), 20563051211038306. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211038306

Klostermann, J., Meißner, M., Max, A., & Decker, R. (2023). Presentation of celebrities’ private life through visual social media. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113524

Kovács, P., Szalárdy, O., Winkler, I., & Tóth, B. (2023). Two effects of perceived speaker similarity in resolving the cocktail party situation – ERPs and functional connectivity. Biological Psychology, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108651

Kumar, B. V., & Shailaja, N. (2024). Social Exchange Theory: Exploring Reciprocity, Equity, and Relationship Management in Diverse Contexts. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32850

Kumar, R., Kaushal, S. K., & Kumar, K. (2022). Does source credibility matter in promoting sustainable consumption? Developing an integrated model. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2021-0257

Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). 2. Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23003-2

Lin, X., Wang, X., & Hajli, M. (2019). Building E-Commerce Satisfaction and Boosting Sales: The Role of Social Commerce Trust and Its Antecedents. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619907

Liu, C., Zhao, Q., Gursoy, D., & Zheng, H. (2024). Livestreamed tourism shopping: Consumers’ attitudes and behaviors. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-01-2024-0040

Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the New Rich and Famous? Explicating the Roles of Influencer Content, Credibility, and Parental Mediation in Adolescents’ Parasocial Relationship, Materialism, and Purchase Intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567

Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019a). Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501

Madden, T. J., Allen, C. T., & Twible, J. L. (1988). Attitude toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices under Different Processing “Sets.” Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500302

Mallipeddi, R. R., Kumar, S., Sriskandarajah, C., & Zhu, Y. (2020). A Framework for Analyzing Influencer Marketing in Social Networks: Selection and Scheduling of Influencers. Decision-Making in Operations Research eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3255198

Mandiri, L. N. P., Jamhari, J., & Darwanto, D. H. (2022). Influencer Marketing Affect Consumer Purchase Decisions On Cimory Product. Agro Ekonomi, 33(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.73195

Mc Guire, I. E. (1968). The Origin of Newton’s Doctrine of Essential Qualities. Centaurus, 12(4), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1968.tb00096.x

McNutt, L. (2021). 5 influencer marketing predictions for 2021. PR Daily. https://www.prdaily.com/5-influencer-marketing-predictions-for-2021/

Molm, L. D. (2010). The Structure of Reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079

Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.1086/517900

Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., & Collett, J. (2007). The Value of Reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000208

Molm, L. D., Whitham, M. M., & Melamed, D. (2012). Forms of Exchange and Integrative Bonds. American Sociological Review, 77, 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411434610

Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302

Nunes, J. C., Ordanini, A., & Giambastiani, G. (2021). The Concept of Authenticity: What It Means to Consumers. Journal of Marketing, 85, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921997081

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191

Onofrei, G., Filieri, R., & Kennedy, L. (2022). Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.031

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156

Pasupathi, M., & Billitteri, J. (2015). Being and Becoming through Being Heard: Listener Effects on Stories and Selves. International Journal of Listening, 29, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363

Petruzzi, D. (2024, December 9). Topic: Skincare industry worldwide. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/3137/cosmetics-industry/

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (Jay). (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004

Poyraz, E. (2020). Interpersonal Communication and Social Exchange Theory. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 10(1), 1-14.

Reer, F., Tang, W. Y., & Quandt, T. (2019). Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: The mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1486–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818823719

Robertson, L. (2020). Who will win the influencer marketing game in 2020? The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2020/01/09/who-will-win-the-influencer-marketing-game-2020

Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024

Ruvio, A., Gavish, Y., & Shoham, A. (2013). Consumer’s doppelganger: A role model perspective on intentional consumer mimicry: Consumer’s doppelganger. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1415

Ryu, S., Min, S., & Park, J. E. J. (2014, October). The Moderating Role of Trust in Determining Inter-Firm Governance Mechanism and Perceived Performance. In Marketing, Technology and Customer Commitment in the New Economy: Proceedings of the 2005 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 27-27). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11779-9_12

Sanders, R. E. (2013). The duality of speaker meaning: What makes self-repair, insincerity, and sarcasm possible. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.020

Scheer, L. K., & Stern, L. W. (1992). The effect of influence type and performance outcomes on attitude toward the influencer. Journal of marketing research, 29(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900111

Shintel, H., & Keysar, B. (2007). You said it before and you’ll say it again: Expectations of consistency in communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33 2, 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.357

Statista. (2025a). Cosmetics—Pakistan | Statista Market Forecast. Statista. http://frontend.xmo.prod.aws.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beauty-personal-care/cosmetics/pakistan

Statista. (2025b). Cosmetics—Worldwide | Statista Market Forecast. Statista. http://frontend.xmo.prod.aws.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beauty-personal-care/cosmetics/worldwide

Statista. (2025c). Skin Care—Pakistan | Statista Market Forecast. Statista. http://frontend.xmo.prod.aws.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beauty-personal-care/skin-care/pakistan

Tang, J., Gao, H., Hu, X., & Liu, H. (2013). Exploiting homophily effect for trust prediction. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2433396.2433405

Tartaglia, S., & Rollero, C. (2015). The Effects of Attractiveness and Status on Personality Evaluation. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 677–690. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i4.896

Treat, T. (2013). Understanding psychological bonds between individuals and organizations: The coalescence model of organizational identification. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(6), 598–600.

Umeogu, B. (2012). Source Credibility: A Philosophical Analysis. Open Journal of Philosophy, 02, 112–115. https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPP.2012.22017

V. Wangenheim, F., & Bayón, T. (2004). The effect of word of mouth on services switching: Measurement and moderating variables. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410548924

Venciute, D., Mackeviciene, I., Kušlys, M., & Correia, R. (2023). The role of influencer–follower congruence in the relationship between influencer marketing and purchase behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103506

Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647

Wang, D., Fu, H., & Fang, S. (2019). The efficacy of trust for the governance of uncertainty and opportunism in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0409

Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2024). Brand Communication Through Social Media Influencers: Trust Building and Trust Transfer Mechanisms. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884241255911

Yilmazdogan, O. C., Doğan, R., & Altıntaş, E. (2021). The impact of the source credibility of Instagram influencers on travel intention: The mediating role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 27, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766721995973

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Iqbal, L., Zaman, S. U., & Alam, S. H. (2025). Social Media Influencers and Cosmetics: The Role of Trust and Materialism in Consumer Purchase Decisions. Journal of Regional Studies Review, 3(1), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2024.3a065

Similar Articles

41-50 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.