Constructing Threat, Sovereignty, and Populist Authority: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s 2025 UN Address

Authors

  • Shakir Shahzad Research Scholar, Department of English, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Musarat Yasmin Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2026.v.iv.232

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Political Discourse, Populist Rhetoric, Ideological Polarization, Discursive Legitimation, National Sovereignty, Donald Trum

Abstract

Political speeches, particularly at international platforms, play a very significant role in shaping public opinion. They influence the understanding of problems and their solutions. Donald Trump’s address to the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, on 23rd September, 2025, draws global attention. It attracts critical focus due to Trump’s assertive tone, his warnings against immigration, his emphasis on national sovereignty, and his criticism on multilateral institutions. This research paper aims to conduct a critical discourse analysis of this speech. Explicitly, the study focuses on Trump’s use of four impression markers: “pronouns”, “modal verbs”, “repetition”, and “parallelism”. These impression markers facilitate Trump in building his narrative on the three major ideological themes: immigration, sovereignty, and global order. To study the link between the small impression markers and the broader ideological narratives, the researcher develops and utilises an integrated framework based on Fairclough’s (2015) three-dimensional model, which is supported by Van Dijk’s (1997) ideological square, Ruth Wodak’s (2001) argumentation strategies, and Charteris-Black’s (2011) rhetorical concept of political charisma. The findings reveal that the impression markers are not only small and simple stylistic features, but they carry the potential to construct the broader ideological discourse. They facilitate Trump in building and legitimizing his discourse that immigration is a threat, national sovereignty is a sacred duty, and unilateral action is necessary to restore the global order. Moreover, the findings also highlight that Trump’s speech contributes to the recent populist discourse.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Musarat Yasmin, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: musarat.yasmin@uog.edu.pk

References

Awawdeh, N. A. A. F. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of President Donald Trump’s speeches during the coronavirus pandemic crisis. Master, Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Arts and Sciences Middle East University, 11.

Cap, P., & Okulska, U. (2013). Analyzing genres in political communication. Theory and Practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Gambino, L., Villarreal, A., & Pengelly, M. (2025, January 20). Trump declares national border emergency in immigration crackdown. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-immigration-emergency-executive-order

Irshad, I. & Yasmin, M. (2025). Positive Self-Representation and Negative Othering: A Critical Discourse Study of a Pakistani Political Press Briefing. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 5(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i2.552

Kanwal, S., & García, M. I. M. (2019). Representation of Gender through Framing: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Hillary Clinton's Selected Speeches. International Journal of English Linguistics. 9(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p321

Li, T., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Language and power: A critical discourse analysis of the political speech. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 5(4), 259–262. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLLL.2019.5.4.238

Majeed, A. A. (2025). A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s 2025 inaugural address as the 45th president of United States of America. International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review, 4(3), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17144694

Ricketts, M. B. (2024, November 12). Information overload in the age of mistrust: Why aren’t we thriving? LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/information-overload-age-mistrust-why-arent-we-bratt-ricketts-pdfdf

Sufi, M. K. & Yasmin, M. (2022). Racialization of Public Discourse: Portrayal of Islam and Muslims. Heliyon, 8 (12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12211

Trump, D. J. (2025, September 23). Speech: Donald Trump addresses the 80th session of the United Nations [Speech transcript]. Roll Call. https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/transcript/donald-trump-speech-80th-united-nations-general-assembly-september-23-2025/

van Dijk, T. A. (Eds.). (1997). Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2). Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Blackwell.

Wang, G., Wu, X., Xiang, Y., & Qu, Y. (2024). Linguistic polyphony in UN speeches on climate change: an analysis of implicit argumentation. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2197609

Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Yasmin, M. (2024). (De-)Legitimizing War: A linguistic analysis of Indian and Pakistani civil and military conflict discourses. Critical Military Studies, 10(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2023.2188997

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Shahzad, S., & Yasmin, M. (2026). Constructing Threat, Sovereignty, and Populist Authority: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s 2025 UN Address. Journal of Regional Studies Review, 5(4), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2026.v.iv.232

Similar Articles

1-10 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.