A Critical Discourse Analysis of Reactionary Twitter Posts on the Motorway Rape Incident (September 09, 2020) in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2024.3a027Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Internet Discourse, TwitterAbstract
This research work aims to analyze the reactionary Twitter posts on the motorway rape incident which took place on September 09, 2020, in Pakistan. For this purpose, a total number of thirteen tweets were taken from the official pages of the Pakistani actors, social influencers, and common citizens. For the qualitative analysis of the collected data, the researchers used the socio-cognitive model of critical discourse analysis proposed by van Dijk (2007). The results of the study revealed that the producers of Twitter posts either supported or resisted the motorway rape incident which took place in Lahore, Pakistan; however, the majority of the tweets were found in favor of the victims of the incidents and against the people who were involved in the criminal act. In order to support their view stance in favor of the in-group (i.e., the victimized) and against the out-group (i.e., those who were involved in the crime), the producers of the discourses of tweets made use of various discursive strategies. They represented the in-group members in a positive way and the out-group members in a very negative tone. The researchers suggest that such acts against the rights of women should strongly be resisted through the discourses of resistance.
References
AbuSa’aleek, A. O. (2015). Internet linguistics: A linguistic analysis of electronic discourse as a new variety of language. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n1p135
Aljarallah, R. (2017). A critical discourse analysis of Twitter posts on the perspectives of women driving in Saudi Arabia [Thesis Dissertation]. Arizona State University.
Arshad, K., Ahmad, S., & Waheed, S. (2020). Retracted: Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Resistance of Islamophobic Ideology in Imran Khan Conference To Unga. JEE (Journal of English Education), 6(2), 131–142. https://www.gjar.org/publishpaper/vol7issue6/d1031r90.pdf
Athar, S., Yousaf, M., & Habib, A. (2018). Us vs them positioning in academic setting: A critical discourse perspective. Global Language Review, III(I), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2018(iii-i).06
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
Bardici, M. V. (2012). A Discourse Analysis of the Media Representation of Social Media for Social Change - The Case of Egyptian Revolution and Political Change [Dissertation]. Malmö högskola/Kultur och samhälle. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-22816
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese discourse, 1(1), 17-28.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse. The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, 175-196.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. Annals of the International Communication Association, 12(1), 18–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1989.11678711
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Comments on Context and Conversation. In N. Fairclough, G. Cortese, & P. Ardizzone (Eds.), Discourse and Contemporary Social Change (pp. 290-295). Bern: Peter Lang.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 338, 376.
Elsharkawy, A. (2017, October). What is critical discourse analysis (CDA). In Second Literary Linguistics Conference (4-6 October 2017, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz). Accessed September (Vol. 5, p. 2018).
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). London: Sage.
Ghachem, I. (2015). A Sociocognitive Approach to Agency Framing in David Cameron's 2010 Pre-election Discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(2), 263-282. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Volume-7_Ghachem.pdf
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive Written Discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008001002
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Ketcham, E. (2011). Internet Discourse: The application of discourse analysis to instant messaging communication [Thesis]. Northeastern University. http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002587
Khan, Q., Sultana, N., & Naz, A. (2015). The linguistic representation of gender identities in Pakhtu proverbs. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 13(II), 73-83.
Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication. Routledge.
Saha, P., & Menezes, R. (2016). Exploring the world languages in twitter. 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2016.0031.
Sheyholislami, J. (2001, September). Critical discourse analysis. Carletion University. http://www.carleton.ca/~jsheyhol/cda.htm
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London : Bloomsbury Publishing. http://digital.casalini.it/9781441123039
Smith, C. S. (2003). Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108
Lee, K. (2001). Teaching discourse stress to Asian students. KOTESOL Proceedings 2001, 103.
Newsom, V. A., & Lengel, L. (2012). Arab Women, Social Media, and the Arab Spring: Applying the framework of digital reflexivity to analyze gender and online activism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 13(5), 31–45. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol13/iss5/5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Khushnood Arshad, Saman Jabir, Sulaiman Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
