Reimagining Social Darwinism through Partition Trauma: A Critical Study of Manto’s Khol Do and Thanda Gosht
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2025.4a083Keywords:
Social Selection, Social Evolution, Natural Selection, Survival of the Fittest, Partition, BodyAbstract
Saddat Hasan Manto, through the disturbing glimpses of Partition as depicted in his short stories Khol Do (2008) and Thanda Gosht (2015) challenges, and interrogates the ideological framework of Social Darwinism which promotes the idea of survival of the fittest and justifies the suffering of the weak, is critically examined in the context of communal violence and moral, ethical, societal collapse during the 1947 Partition of India. Through the psychological disintegration of Eshar Singh and the violated innocence of Sakina, Manto dismantles the glorification of power, aggression, and domination. His stories reveal that violence and competition do not mark strength or progress but lead to profound human and societal failure. By portraying emotionally and morally broken characters who survive but are not truly ‘fit’ Manto resists the dehumanizing implications of Social Darwinism and underlines the necessity of compassion, accountability, and the moral dimensions of survival. This study highlights Manto’s use of literature as a counter-narrative to oppressive ideologies of religion and a voice for the silenced victims of history.
References
Ahmed, B., Ali, I., & Khan, F. (2024). Politics of Death: Existence and its Dynamics Echoed in Bapsi Sidhwa’s Ice-Candy-Man. Social Science Review Archives, 2(2), 2234-2248. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v2i2.399
Baumgart, Winfried. (1982) Imperialism: The Idea and Reality of British and French Colonial Expansion, 1880– 1914. Oxford University Press. U.K
Britannica. (2019). Francis Galton | Biography, Travels, & Eugenics. In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francis-Galton
Claeys, G. (2000). The" survival of the fittest" and the origins of social darwinism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 61(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2000.0014
Dickens, P. (2000). Social Darwinism: Linking Evolutionary Thought to Social Theory. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
Halliday, R. J. (1971). Social Darwinism: A Definition. Victorian Studies, 14(4), 389–405. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3825958
Hofstadter, R. (1992). Social Darwinism in American thought. Beacon Press.
Lugard, F. D. (1922). The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. London and Edinburgh: Blackwood.
Manto, S. H. (2008). Manto’s Selected Stories (A. Taseer, Trans.) [Review of Manto’s Selected Stories]. Random House India.
Manto, S. H. (2015). My Name is Radha (M. U. Memon, Trans.) [Review of My Name is Radha]. Penguin Group India.
Spencer, H. (1892). Social statics: Abridged and revised; Together with the man versus the state. D. Appleton and Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
