A Realist Evaluation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict between Armenia-Azerbaijan and its Strategic Implications for Russia

Abstract

This Paper examines the lengthy-strolling Armenia-Azerbaijan warfare over Nagorno-Karabakh and its strategic ramifications for Russia using each classical and neorealist theories of worldwide family members.  It investigates two major queries: (1) How does the Nagorno-Karabakh war illustrate fundamental realist concepts?  (2) What outcomes has the struggle had on Russia's strategic pastimes and local power dynamics? The Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, which has its roots in the fall of the Soviet Union, is characterized by way of fierce nationalism, territorial claims, and violent outbursts, the maximum current of which occurred in 2020.  The actions of Armenia and Azerbaijan, which both region a higher precedence on navy might, alliances, and territorial manage than on liberal or legal requirements, are explained by using realist principle, which emphasises anarchic global family members, countrywide interest, and energy struggles. Russia's involvement serves as any other instance of realism in motion.  Moscow continues near commercial and electricity hyperlinks with Azerbaijan, even though it has an army base in Gyumri and a formal alliance with Armenia via the CSTO.  A realism approach to control both sides and hold Western powers out of the place is reflected in this twin engagement. Russia reinforced its regional power after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh crisis by negotiating a truce and deploying peacekeepers. Turkey’s support for Azerbaijan heightened regional complexities, reflecting power struggles and realist alliances influencing stability and geopolitical dynamics in the South Caucasus. All things considered, the battle is a prime instance of realist dynamics in submit-Soviet geopolitics, where regional conflicts further larger strength agendas and exhibit the continuing applicability of realism in comprehending worldwide affairs.