Green Transition and Environmental Uncertainty: Implications for Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Human Resource Capabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2026.5a167Keywords:
Green Transition, Environmental Uncertainty, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Human Resource CapabilitiesAbstract
This paper will seek to investigate how green transition and perceived environmental uncertainty influence the innovation ecosystem through the Resource-Based View (RBV) theory. It explains how green transition can help organizations to create valuable, rare and sustainable resources that facilitate innovation, while perceived uncertainty of the environment can result in instability that could impede the development of ecosystems of innovation. The information will be gathered through a structured questionnaire among workers in various organizations, using convenience sampling to target about 300 respondents. SPSS will be used to analyse the data by performing reliability analysis and regression analysis to test how effective green transition and perceived environmental uncertainty are on the innovation ecosystem. Based on the anticipated results, a positive impact of green transition on innovation ecosystem is expected through sustainable practices, technological development, and collaborative innovation. Perceived environmental uncertainty is assumed to impact negatively on the ecosystem of innovation because uncertainty scares away long-term investment, coordination, and innovative actions between organizations. The research will be relevant to RBV theory by focusing on green transition as an organizational resource that supports innovation, whereas environmental uncertainty undermines the efficient use of resources. In practice, the study can inform managers and policymakers on how environmental innovation can be reinforced by taking up green initiatives and addressing environmental uncertainty. However, the cross-sectional design, self-reported information, and convenience sampling may limit generalization. Future research incorporating longitudinal designs or various industries can improve robustness.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, P. D., & Vicentini, F. (2023). Effects of human capital on entrepreneurial ecosystems in the emerging economy: the mediating role of digital knowledge and innovative capability from India perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(1), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0177
Dent, T., Comunian, R., & Kim, S. (2025). Entrepreneurial capability? Understanding the resources needed for sustainable cultural and creative entrepreneurship in cities. A case study of Enschede, The Netherlands. City, Culture and Society, 43, 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2025.100672
Dzimba, E., & van der Poll, J. A. (2024). Disruptive innovation capability in resource-constrained environments: The role of strategic posture and human capital. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100326
Guerrero, M., & Siegel, D. S. (2024). Schumpeter meets Teece: Proposed metrics for assessing entrepreneurial innovation and dynamic capabilities in entrepreneurial ecosystems in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 53(5), 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104984
Hu, H., Liang, Z., Yin, H.-T., & Chang, C.-P. (2025). Turbocharging SME sustainability: AI’s role in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Economic Analysis and Policy, 88, 1939-1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.11.013
Hu, W., & Tresirichod, T. (2024). Relationship between green entrepreneurial orientation, green intellectual capital, green supply chain management, and sustainable performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.1.00390
Kariv, D., Guiliani, F., Mejía-Morelos, J., Cisneros, L., & Chouchane, R. (2025). Harnessing psychological capital for technological capability development: An entrepreneurial response to crises. Technology in Society, 82, 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102942
Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Johl, S. K. (2021). Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2922–2936. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2779
Kiefer, C. P., del Río, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2021). On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: a microlevel quantitative approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1531-1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2688
Marquardt, L., & Harima, A. (2024). Digital boundary spanning in the evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114762
Mensah, P. O., Yong, J. Y., Dura, C. C., & Mensah, H. K. (2025). Institutional networking capability as a catalyst for sustainable supply chains in the manufacturing sector of Ghana: The role of green human resource management strategy and green dynamic capability. Journal of Environmental Management, 387, 125865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125865
Mujiatun, S., Trianto, B., Cahyono, E. F., & Rahmayati, R. (2025). The effects of Islamic financial literacy on entrepreneurial venture performance and halal tourism ecosystem development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(6), 1250-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2023-0108
Nana, A., Laviolette, E. M., & Theodoraki, C. (2026). Preincubation practices as sourcing in entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Business Research, 203, 115829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115829
Napoli, P. H., Fischer, B. B., & Moraes, G. H. S. M. d. (2025). Entrepreneurial agency reloaded: Intentions, capabilities and the dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 23, e00540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00540
Qin, S. (2026). Revitalising the periphery: How support organisations drive the inclusive evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing, 41(1), 106557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106557
Roundy, P. T., & Burke-Smalley, L. (2022). Leveraging entrepreneurial ecosystems as human resource systems: A theory of meta-organizational human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100863
Shatila, K., Aránega, A. Y., Soga, L. R., & Hernández-Lara, A. B. (2025). Digital literacy, digital accessibility, human capital, and entrepreneurial resilience: a case for dynamic business ecosystems. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(3), 100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100709
Shrestha, R. K., Yukongdi, V., & Badir, Y. F. (2025). Utilizing formal and informal social networks for resource acquisition: insights from an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a low-income country. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 14(4), 456-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-12-2022-0401
Zheng, F., Sun, H., Ren, R., & Chang, W. (2024). Impact of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem on startup performance: An empirical study from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103611
Zhou, J., & Li, H. (2024). Review and prospects of green innovation ecosystems from the perspective of value emergence. Systems, 12(6), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12060206
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
