The Influence of Students’ Perceptions of AI on their Learning Behaviour at Mirpur University of Science and Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/v.iv.242Keywords:
Students’ Perceptions, Artificial Intelligence, Learning BehaviourAbstract
Students’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) refer to their beliefs, attitudes, and understanding regarding the use of AI in education, whereas learning behaviour refers to students’ engagement, motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies in their academic careers. This study aimed to identify students’ perceptions of AI, examine their learning behaviour, and determine the relationship between students’ perceptions of AI and learning behaviour at Mirpur University of Science and Technology. A quantitative research approach was employed using a self-designed questionnaire comprising 20 items divided into two sections: students’ perceptions of AI and learning behaviour. Data from 30 students were collected to assess the questionnaire’s reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, which was found to be 0.72. The questionnaire’s validity was checked by two education experts. Data were collected from students of the Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, and MUST Business School. A sample of 377 students was selected through proportionate stratified sampling, of which 367 completed questionnaires were returned. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis through SPSS. The findings revealed that the relationship between students’ perceptions of AI and learning behaviour was not statistically significant, although positive perceptions of AI were associated with improved academic engagement and learning behaviour. The study recommends that universities provide AI literacy and digital support services, including training and academic guidance, to help students succeed academically. Universities should also promote the ethical, responsible, and effective use of AI tools to support students’ learning experiences and academic development.
References
Alghazo, R., Fatima, G., Malik, M., Abdelhamid, S. E., Jahanzaib, M., Nayab, D. E., & Raza, A. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT’s role in higher education: Perspectives from Pakistani university students on academic integrity and ethical challenges. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020158
Ashraf, M. A., Alam, J., & Kalim, U. (2025). Effects of ChatGPT on students’ academic performance in Pakistan higher education classrooms. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 16434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01132-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), Article 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Majeed, S., Khan, A. Y., Khan, K., Rafiq, F., & Shan, R. U. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in academia: Knowledge, attitude, and practices of undergraduate students in Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(3), 2763–2774. https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/1457
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
Shafqat, F., & Amjad, A. I. (2024). Examining students’ perceptions, experiences, and ethical concerns about using ChatGPT for academic support: A phenomenological study. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(2), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2024(8-II)36
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
